Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Should charter schools be called “public schools”? | Seattle Education

Should charter schools be called “public schools”? | Seattle Education:


Should charter schools be called “public schools”?

Diane Ravitch described in a post yesterday why charter schools are public schools in name only.
To follow is an excerpt from her letter to Deborah Meier on Bridging Differences:
Are Charter Schools Public Schools?
I noted in my blog last week that the visionaries of the charter school idea—Raymond Budde of the University of Massachusetts and Albert Shanker of the American Federation of Teachers—never intended that charter schools would compete with public schools.
Budde saw charters as a way to reorganize public school districts and to provide more freedom for teachers. He envisioned teams of teachers asking for a charter for three to five years, during which time they would operate with full autonomy over curriculum and instruction, with no interference from the superintendent or the principal.
Shanker thought that charter schools should be created by teams of teachers who would explore new ways to reach unmotivated students. He envisioned charter schools as self-governing, as schools that encouraged faculty decisionmaking and participatory governance. He imagined schools that taught by coaching rather than lecturing, that strived for creativity and problem-solving rather than mastery of standardized tests or regurgitation of facts. He never thought of charters as non-union schools where teachers would work 70-hour weeks and be