Friday, April 30, 2010

City Brights: Rachel Norton : Will Arne Duncan take California to the prom?

City Brights: Rachel Norton : Will Arne Duncan take California to the prom?

Will Arne Duncan take California to the prom?

Is it just me, or is the on-again, off-again California-Arne Duncan romance just like a John Hughes movie? Education Secretary Duncan is like the cute popular guy who stood us up on our last date, coming around again all contrite and promising to make it up to us by taking us to the prom with a limo and everything. Can we trust him? Will his snobby friends accept us? How will it end for sweet, impoverished California?

What I mean is this: there's a lot of speculation out there that California might enter Round II of Race to the Top after all, but take things in a very different direction after our dismal showing in Round I of the national competition for education dollars. The state was reportedly just days away from dropping out of the race entirely, but after some heavy lobbying from Federal officials (Duncan reportedly made a personal call to Governor Schwarzenegger over the weekend, urging that the state resubmit its application), the state has come up with a new idea. John Fensterwald of the Silicon Valley Education Foundation reports:

Instead of revising the state plan and then pitching it again to every district and union local, California would limit its application to a handful of forward-thinking urban districts with predominately minority, low-income students: Long Beach, Fresno, Los Angeles Unified, and perhaps a few others willing to commit to stronger reforms than in the first round.

The state would make the case that the three to six participating districts, with upward of 850,000 students, are still larger than most states, and would set an example for other California districts.

Maybe, but it's still a long shot. We didn't even come close the last time around, largely due to the lack of union support. I don't see that changing if the competition continues to demand things



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/rnorton/detail??blogid=184&entry_id=62522#ixzz0maE5RlJK