If the superintendent is going isn't going to be honest about subs what else will she not be honest about.
On Facebook, I posed this question:
The super said we had 2000 subs ready to go, including some trained to do virtual learning. I don't think this is accurate. Every day there is a call for several sub-teams at my school. I was wondering if any teachers have had a hard time getting a sub or have had to cover classes because of teacher absences.
I put in on my personal page and four others whose primary focus was local education. The response was overwhelming and damning.
The posts received over a hundred comments, and I received 11 personal messages about subs, and overwhelmingly they reported issues.
Classes are being canceled, classes are being split, and teachers are being called to cover their colleagues' classes at a pace like never before. Why? Because we don't have the subs like Greene said we did.
Now somebody supposed when she said it, this was her doing a poker bluff, and sure I buy that but should the super be bluffing during a pandemic about coverage for classes? Should she be making stuff up? She also did so when talking about openings. She said we had 80 a few weeks back when we had twice that many.
https://jaxkidsmatter.blogspot.com/2020/07/about-those-2000-subs.html
Being deceptive isn't her only disturbing behavior. She has ignored science from the get-go and also ignored CONTINUE READING: Education Matters: If the superintendent is going isn't going to be honest about subs what else will she not be honest about.