Sunday, March 1, 2020

NANCY BAILEY: There’s No “Science of Reading” Without School Libraries and Librarians, A Predictor of Student Success

There’s No “Science of Reading” Without School Libraries and Librarians, A Predictor of Student Success

There’s No “Science of Reading” Without School Libraries and Librarians, A Predictor of Student Success


The loss of libraries and qualified librarians in the poorest schools has reached a critical mass. Yet those who promote a Science of Reading (SoR), often supporting online reading programs, never mention the loss of school libraries or qualified librarians.
Ignoring the importance of school libraries and certified librarians delegitimizes any SoR. Children need books, reading material, and real librarians in public schools. If reading instruction doesn’t lead to reading and learning from books, what’s the point? Why should children care about decoding words if there’s no school library where they can browse and choose reading material that matters?
How do school districts prioritize reading when they shutter the only access some students have to books? Who will assist students when qualified school librarians are dismissed?
Across the country, as noted below, public school districts have chaotically closed school libraries and fired librarians. They have done this despite the fact that school libraries and qualified librarians are proven positive factors in raising reading scores in CONTINUE READING: There’s No “Science of Reading” Without School Libraries and Librarians, A Predictor of Student Success