Can the Charter Movement Be Saved?
Can we agree that the charter school ‘movement’ is in big trouble? Scandals emerge daily, or so it seems. “Are Charter Schools the New Enron?”, one reputable study asks, for example. Here’s one awful scandal. Here’s another. This is not just smoke; it’s a raging fire that threatens all charter schools, it seems to me.
Everyone knows that charter schools are publicly funded but privately run, supposedly bound by a ‘charter’ that spells out what the school will accomplish. These licenses, typically for three or five years, are not supposed to be renewed if the school does not deliver. That does happen occasionally, but most often charters are renewed unless and until some awful scandal–usually financial–emerges. And most charter schools are not financially transparent, meaning that it’s probable that more skullduggery goes unnoticed than is exposed. That means that public funds–possibly billions of dollars–have been going into private pockets. I write about this at some length in “Addicted to Reform: A 12-Step Program to Rescue Public Education” (which is available at good bookstores and on Amazon).
Charter schools were supposed to allow educators to innovate and improve student learning, and the best of them have done so. However, academically, the overall results are mixed at best, and in some instances have led to more segregation by race and class.
Those interested in the history of the movement should turn to Ember Reichgott Junge’s book, Zero Chance of Passage, a compelling read. For critical analysis of the book and the charter story in Minnesota, go here.
I’ve been interested in this story since I moderated the founding meeting at the Continue reading: Can the Charter Movement Be Saved? | The Merrow Report
