PA: Report Shows Charter Financial Impact
The report is 105 pages long, so I'm going to be focusing on just some of the highlights here.
How PA Stacks up Against US
The committee looked to compare PA to its chartery brethren and sistern, so it looked across all forty-three states that allow charter schools. In particular, they noted some differences in charter laws.
* Twenty-two states (including PA) have no caps on schools on enrollment.
* Eleven states (including PA) require public schools to provide transportation for charter students.
* Thirteen states include "access" to local funding in charter revenue. PA is up in front of the pack on this, which makes a certain kind of sense since PA also leads the pack in requiring local revenue to fund public schools.
* PA is one of two states that has a special ed supplemental formula. That means every charter gets some funding based on nothing more than the assumption that around 16% of its student body is special needs. According to PDE data, in the 20145-2015 school year, the state gave $466.8 million in special ed tuition payments to charter schools, and roughly $294.8 million of that was special ed supplement. Actual charter expenditures on special ed-- $193.1 million. In other words, in PA and Massachusetts, it's extra-profitable for a charter NOT to take students with special needs, because they will get paid to educate those students even if those students are not enrolled at the school.
* PA is one of the the only three states that let charters appeal to the courts when they don't like CURMUDGUCATION: PA: Report Shows Charter Financial Impact: