At Yesterday's (Kind) Wild Executive Committee Meeting of the Whole
It was a hugely important meeting, if a bit wild. Because there is SO much happening right now for our district and I'm trying to chase down so much information, I only have time for highlights:
The district has ended its relationship with the Alliance for Education (for the most part). I will scan and post their letter but it is very damning. Basically, the district says it has been trying, for years, to get on a better footing with the Alliance. There are several allegations by the district.
The letter says:
- that the Alliance did some fundraising, using SPS' name, that didn't exactly find its way back to the district
- that a superintendent (I'm assuming Banda) was bad-mouthed by the Alliance behind his back AND during an Alliance social event
- It says that the Alliance met with some principals without district permission or knowledge.
The district will have to find another fiscal agent for those PTAs using the Alliance's (expensive) services. I had heard at an A&F meeting that they did send out an RFP and only the Alliance submitted a proposal. I find that hard to believe in a city of Seattle's size that no other firm was even interested. (I Seattle Schools Community Forum: At Yesterday's (Kind) Wild Executive Committee Meeting of the Whole:
Unhappy with the District?
In addition to the perennial issues of the district - Special Education, Advanced Learning, ELL, building conditions, the debt on JSCEE and, of course, funding - we have more that have risen up. To whit:
- staffing cuts at more than 25 schools this year
- bell times
- City's pre-K and their ever-increasing desire for space in the district
- capacity issues
- facilities' issues
- curriculum choices/use
- increased spending at district administration
(Please, add to the list.)
The clamor is ever louder. The frustration is growing - for teachers, parents, students, principals. I'm sure district staff is frustrated but senior management is large and in charge and really, most of it is on them. They HAVE to find better and more transparent ways to communicate.
It really is the communications that is killing them. They refuse to treat parents as adults and give them full explanations of current situations. They obfuscate, they deflect, they tell half the story and it is hurting this district.
But what to do? I would say - as I frequently do when senior staff don't appear to be listening - the district needs a shock to the system. But maybe a gradual build-up might just do the trick.
- as has been previously suggested, start opting your child out of any non-required testing, starting with Amplify. If you are asked, tell your teacher and your principal that this is your stand against how the district is being managed. Politely state that yes, you know the blah, blah on how taking the test helps your kid but that you feel that, overall, the direction of the district and the treatment of parents in the district is being hurt much more and that you want the district to listen to parents.
- the Board WILL have three new members in just about two months (new members generally are installed in early December). Maybe four new members. I'm sure that some of the senior staff are already trying to figure out how to "manage" these new members (as I'm sure the Mayor and Tim Burgess are as well). Those new members will need to find a way to become a team with the remaining members but also, to review the issues and find a new way.