There are No Oversized Apples for Oversized Classes
This Apple Will Probably Never Make it to a Teacher's Desk...
Ed. "reformers" believe that branding teachers as "ineffective" is the single most important way to improve educational outcomes. Although driving away experienced teachers with seniority and burgeoning pensions may cut costs, it fails to help students. Cutting class size, however, so teachers can deal more effectively with individuals, would work miracles. Too bad, the financial costs of such reform make it prohibitive; too bad ed. "reformers" are more concerned about their personal pocketbooks than profiting students.
I teach three of my five classes in a row. Each class contains about 37 students; the number will hopefully soon be reduced to 34. Whether 37 or 34, the numbers are overwhelming. When I return to the workroom after three periods, I have about one-hundred homework papers in hand. Let me picture an ed. "reformer" grading that many papers on a regular basis. Ineffective!
When I collect essay papers, I can get as many as 175. If I fail to grade the old work before the new work comes due, the profusion of papers mounts. Try keeping one set straight from another. It is a profound triumph of organizational skill. It is time-consuming, not to mention, a literally heavy burden. Now, imagine trying to read each paper carefully and electronically enter grades. Ineffective, again!
When students write short responses in class, provided the students are well-behaved, I try to circulate around the room and read as many as I can. I end up skimming papers, trying to find some further question to ask each student or some grammatical suggestion. I try to fly around the room NYC Educator: There are No Oversized Apples for Oversized Classes: