4 Arguments That Scream "Save Public Education!" | Alternet:
4 Arguments That Scream "Save Public Education!"
A vibrant society makes great individuals, not the other way around.
 |
| Photo Credit: Suzanne Tucker / Shutterstock.com |
The education privatizers are trying to convince us that parental 'choice' will solve all the problems in our schools. But the choice they have in mind is to dismantle a once-proud system of education that was nurtured and funded by a society of Americans willing to work together.
The wealthiest among us seem to have forgotten how important it is to cooperate, as most Americans did in the post-WW2 years, in order to forge new paths of productivity and inventiveness. A vibrant society makes great individuals, not the other way around. Education must be at the forefront of such cooperative thinking. Here are four good arguments for it.
1. Equal Opportunity is an American Mandate
In the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown vs. the Board of Education, Chief Justice Earl Warren said that education "is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms." Equally eminent future Justice Thurgood Marshall insisted on "the right of every American to an equal start in life."
But now, as
The Economist points out, "Whereas most OECD countries spend more on the education of poor children than rich ones, in America the opposite is true." Poverty, of course, is of all colors, but it's disproportionately black. The
Civil Rights Project at UCLA shows that "segregated schools are systematically linked to unequal educational opportunities," while the
Economic Policy Institute tells us that "African American students are more isolated than they were 40 years ago."
New York City is the best example of that.
Charters and vouchers are the 'choice' of the free market. But the
National Education Policy Center notes that "Charter schools...can shape their student enrollment in surprising ways," through practices that often exclude "students with special needs, those with low test scores, English learners, or students in poverty." Stanford's updated
CREDO study found that
fewer special education students and fewer English language learners are served in charters than in traditional public schools.
2. Charter Advocate Michelle Rhee Is Wrong
She
said, "I think that we are doing the wrong thing in our society when we are congratulating mediocrity and participation." But among American children, whether 'mediocre' or 'exceptional,' the ability to participate in a cooperative manner
should be congratulated. Children have to learn
4 Arguments That Scream "Save Public Education!" | Alternet:
