Thursday, December 19, 2013

Shanker Blog » In Opposition To Academic Boycotts

Shanker Blog » In Opposition To Academic Boycotts:

In Opposition To Academic Boycotts

Posted by  on December 19, 2013

Academic Boycotts


Our guest author today is Rita Freedman, Acting Executive Director of the Jewish Labor Committee, and a recent retiree from the American Federation of Teachers.
There is a growing, worldwide effort to ostracize Israel and to make it into a pariah state. (This despite the fact that Israel is still the only democratic country in the Middle East.)  A key ingredient of this campaign is the call to boycott, divest from and impose sanctions on Israel (known as BDS for boycott, divest, sanction).  Within the world of higher education, this takes the form of calls to boycott all Israeli academic institutions, sometimes including boycotting all Israeli scholars and researchers. The rationale is that this will somehow pressure Israel into an agreement with the Palestinians, one which will improve their lot and lead to an independent Palestinian state that exists adjacent to the State of Israel (although it is worth noting that some in the BDS movement envision a future without the existence of Israel).  
Certainly, the goals of improving life for the Palestinian people, building their economy and supporting their democratic institutions – not to mention supporting the creation of an independent Palestine that is thriving and getting along peacefully with its Israeli neighbor – are entirely worthy. 
And, certainly, Israeli (and indeed Palestinian) policies that obstruct progress toward these goals are not above criticism (a great deal of which can be found within the free press and lively opposition among the many political parties and independent judiciary within Israel itself).  Individuals and groups in other nations should make their views known as well, and that includes the world of academia.  Open discussion and debate of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and ways to resolve it should be encouraged.   However, those discussions should not be one-sided. They should consider the behavior of all those involved in the dispute.  Otherwise, they are likely to produce the result