Friday, May 24, 2013

Most Screwed Local Public School Districts Update 2009-2011 | School Finance 101

Most Screwed Local Public School Districts Update 2009-2011 | School Finance 101:

Most Screwed Local Public School Districts Update 2009-2011

Here it is – my annual update of America’s most screwed school districts. This time, for stability purposes, I’ve used a 3-year average based on 2009-2011 data (2011 data being released earlier this week).
As I’ve explained in my previous posts on this topic (from last year’s post on screwed districts)…
It’s important to understand that the value of any given level of education funding, in any given location, is relative. That is, it doesn’t simply matter that a district has or spends $10,000 per pupil, or $20,000 per pupil. What matters is how that funding compares to other districts operating in the same labor market, and for that matter, how that money relates to other conditions in the region/labor market. Why? Well, schooling is labor intensive.  And the quality of schooling depends largely on the ability of schools or districts to recruit and retain quality employees. And yes… despite reformy arguments to the contrary – competitive wages for teachers matter!  The largest share of school district annual operating budgets is tied up in the salaries and wages of teachers and other school workers. The ability to recruit and retain teachers in a school district in any given labor market depends on the wage a district can pay to teachers a) relative to other surrounding schools/districts and b) relative to non-teaching alternatives in the same labor market.
In our funding fairness report, we present statewide profiles of disparities in funding with respect to poverty. But, I