Why Isn't the Discussion about the Actual Charter Bill?
Reader Mr. White said this in another thread:
When people complain about Seattle process with too many meddling parents asking questions and too many groups seeking answers, oh my, who wants to come here? they're serving as a distraction from the facts.
I have written frequently and in varied places about the issues in this charter bill. I am talking here about the descriptions within the bill about how charters would be carried out in our state, not my opinion.
In no place - not LEV, not the Times, not here, not anywhere - has a single person said "No, you read the bill wrong." "You have this fact wrong."
Not on a single point in a single place.
That means that every charter support that has read the Times comments or read LEV's posts or even the posts
When people complain about Seattle process with too many meddling parents asking questions and too many groups seeking answers, oh my, who wants to come here? they're serving as a distraction from the facts.
Ab-so-lu-te-ly.
I have written frequently and in varied places about the issues in this charter bill. I am talking here about the descriptions within the bill about how charters would be carried out in our state, not my opinion.
In no place - not LEV, not the Times, not here, not anywhere - has a single person said "No, you read the bill wrong." "You have this fact wrong."
Not on a single point in a single place.
That means that every charter support that has read the Times comments or read LEV's posts or even the posts