Wednesday, November 2, 2011

British Judges Affirm Importance of Real Consent in Rejecting Assange’s Rape Defense « Student Activism

British Judges Affirm Importance of Real Consent in Rejecting Assange’s Rape Defense « Student Activism:

British Judges Reject Assange’s Rape Defense

A British court has ruled against Julian Assange in his bid to avoid extradition to Sweden to face rape and sexual molestation charges against two women.

The two judges ruled on a variety of technical and jurisdictional issues, but the meat of their ruling addressed two questions: whether the complaints against Assange accurately described the behaviors alleged, and whether such acts, if proven, constituted criminal offenses in the jurisdiction in which they occurred.

Rejecting the Assange legal team’s attempt to portray his alleged actions as “disrespectful” or “disturbing” but not criminal, the judges declared (PDF) that the complaint accurately described the allegations and that the behavior described in each of the charges was criminal under the laws of England and Wales:

The first complaint described a situation in which Assange held down the arms of the woman known as AA,