Thursday, July 21, 2011

Misrepresenting the “Preponderance of the Evidence” Standard on Campus Sexual Assault Hearings « Student Activism

Misrepresenting the “Preponderance of the Evidence” Standard on Campus Sexual Assault Hearings « Student Activism

Misrepresenting the “Preponderance of the Evidence” Standard on Campus Sexual Assault Hearings

The Department of Education recently issued new guidelines on campus policies on sexual assault, including a directive that judicial bodies investigating sexual assault allegations employ the “preponderance of the evidence” standard in their deliberations.

“Preponderance of the evidence” is the standard commonly used in resolving civil cases — lawsuits — in the United States. It basically means that the question at hand will be resolved by a determination of which party’s version of events is more likely to be true. (“Beyond a reasonable doubt” is the standard of guilt used in criminal cases in the US, and there are other standards used in other circumstances, too.)

I don’t yet have an opinion on the DOE’s directive, and I think it’s an important question, so I’ve been reading up