Race To The Top's "Blackmail" While California Schools Suffer
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
By Robert Cruickshank
Calitics alum David Dayen takes a look at the recent announcement that Delaware and Tennessee have won a chunk of the "Race To The Top" funds awarded by Education Secretary Arne Duncan, and reaches a conclusion I wholly endorse:
I hope we can be honest about what this actually represents: blackmail. It forces states to change their education laws to fit particular notions about how to manage public education in America. And it does so at a time of crippling state budgets, when the Race to the Top funds mean the difference between thousands of teachers laid off or kept on the job, between class sizes expanding or shrinking. Basically, Arne Duncan and the White House are leveraging crisis to make preferred changes in education policy....
But the metrics for winning these stimulus funds comes down to "what Arne Duncan likes about education policy."...What we do know is that only one side of this debate is withholding funding until their preferred policy prescriptions are enacted. And they're doing it at a time when the biggest obstacle to education in America in the near-term can be measured in dollars and cents. Giant budget shortfalls in the states mean layoffs for teachers and worse opportunities for students, whether your state has a cap on charter schools or not.
I've been slamming Arne Duncan's shock doctrine attack on public education for some time now, calling on Sacramento to repeal policy changes recently enacted to pursue the Race To The Top funds, only for Secretary Duncan to deny California's grant application. I also similarly called on the Washington State legislature to reject proposals that would make that state eligible for RTTT funds.
It makes no sense for states to adopt unproven educational reforms merely because