Bruner’s Law
Bruner’s Law -we want kids to regard success and failure as information not as reward and punishment.
Last week, I had the pleasure meeting and listening to Alfie Kohn talk about the topics of homework and grading. At one point he mentioned the something he called Bruner’s Law. Of the many things that struck me during the discussion (or lecture, I should say), this one was the most important.
Kohn referenced the work of Carol Dweck and others who have worked with motivation, praise and punishment and studied the effect of all three on learning over time. What they’ve found, and I know that I am over-generalizing here, is that students who are rewarded with grades do poorly when compared with students who are not given grades on similar assignments. Interestingly too, is that the bigger the reward promised, the worse the graded group did.
The room, at this point, was full of shaking heads and “that can’t be true’s” and “not in my experiences’s.”
There would be no more radical shift in education as we know it to remove the concept of reward and punishment. Think deeply about the ramifications that would follow: A’s are good, A+’s are better. This college is good, that one is better. Behaving this way is good, but that way is better. Behaviorism still dominates many of our practices, both in the classroom and in our institutional structure. What worries me most is that we have begun to educate students in the practices of doing school and succeeding in this system–will they be able to