COMMUNIST BILLIONAIRE: AN OXYMORON OR JUST BUSINESS AS USUAL

 
COMMUNIST BILLIONAIRE

AN OXYMORON OR JUST BUSINESS AS USUAL

Let’s talk about billionaires in China—a phrase that feels like it should come with a footnote, an asterisk, and maybe a disclaimer. The idea of billionaires thriving in a country ruled by the Communist Party seems paradoxical, like spotting a vegan at a barbecue competition or finding a minimalist hoarding storage bins. But alas, the world is full of surprises, and yes, communist billionaires are indeed a thing.

Communism and Capitalism: A Match Made in... China?

China's billionaires are a fascinating breed, navigating a system that officially champions equality while quietly cheering for entrepreneurial success. The country's economic model is often described as "socialism with Chinese characteristics," which, when translated, means "capitalism but don't call it that." It’s an arrangement where private wealth is tolerated—nay, encouraged—as long as it doesn’t threaten the Party’s grip on power. 

Take Jack Ma, for instance, the founder of Alibaba and one of China’s most famous billionaires. His rise was meteoric, his success undeniable, and his influence... well, let’s just say it got a little *too* noticeable for Beijing’s liking. After some public comments critiquing China's regulatory system, Ma found himself taking an extended sabbatical from the limelight. Message received, loud and clear: In China, you can be rich, but don’t forget who’s really in charge.

Taxation: The Billionaire's Balancing Act

Now, let’s dive into the juicy details of taxes—because nothing says "witty article" like tax rates! In China, individual income tax rates range from 3% to 45%, with corporate taxes sitting at a standard 25%. But wait, there’s more! High-tech enterprises and pollution-prevention companies can enjoy reduced rates as low as 15%, while certain small businesses get an even sweeter deal at just 5%. It’s almost like the Chinese government is saying, “We’ll tax you, but we won’t *tax* you.”

But here’s where things get interesting: China doesn’t have local or provincial income taxes, which means billionaires aren’t facing the multi-layered tax bureaucracy their American counterparts endure. On the flip side, the ultra-rich in China are increasingly being targeted with taxes on overseas investment gains. This crackdown is part of President Xi Jinping’s vision for “common prosperity,” which aims to redistribute wealth without completely dismantling the billionaire class—because who else is going to fund those flashy infrastructure projects?

Comparing Tax Systems: China vs. The U.S.

Let’s pit China against the U.S. in a battle of tax policies. In the red corner, we have China with its preference for consumption taxes (like VAT), which economists argue are less harmful to economic growth. In the blue corner, we have the U.S., where income taxes reign supreme and corporate tax rates recently dropped to 21% after the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. 

China offers significant perks for corporations, including shorter asset deduction periods and generous R&D subsidies. Meanwhile, American billionaires often rely on loopholes and offshore accounts to minimize their tax burdens—because nothing says “patriotism” like dodging Uncle Sam.

Both countries use their tax systems as political tools. In the U.S., tax policy debates are practically a national pastime, with Democrats and Republicans perpetually at odds over whether billionaires should pay more or less. In China, however, tax policy isn’t up for public debate—it’s more of a top-down directive. When Beijing decides to target the ultra-rich with new taxes or crack down on influencers evading income declarations (looking at you, Viya), there’s little room for negotiation.

Billionaires Walking the Tightrope

Being a billionaire in China isn’t just about amassing wealth; it’s about knowing how to navigate the political landscape. The government has made it clear that excessive wealth must align with national priorities. For example, several Chinese tycoons have recently donated large sums to charity—not necessarily out of altruism but perhaps as a strategic move to stay in the government’s good graces.

The stakes are high for billionaires who step out of line. Beijing has shown that it’s willing to enforce compliance through fines, asset seizures, or even public shaming. And yet, despite these risks, China continues to churn out billionaires at an astonishing rate. In fact, according to Forbes' Billionaire List, China is second only to the U.S. in terms of billionaire count—proof that capitalism thrives even under the watchful eye of the Communist Party.

Politics of Taxes: A Tale of Two Nations

In America, taxes are deeply intertwined with political ideologies. Liberals argue for higher taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs, while conservatives advocate for lower taxes to stimulate economic growth. These debates often play out in election campaigns and congressional battles, making tax policy a central theme in U.S. politics.

In China, however, the politics of taxes are less theatrical but equally strategic. Tax reforms are implemented as part of broader economic plans—like Xi Jinping’s “common prosperity” initiative—which aims to curb inequality without sparking rebellion among the elite. The government has also introduced advanced tools like the Golden Tax System Phase III to track wealth and enforce compliance. It’s less about public discourse and more about quiet efficiency.

The Irony of "Common Prosperity"

Let’s not ignore the irony here: A country rooted in communist ideology is grappling with widening income inequality and an exploding billionaire class. President Xi has called for redistributing excessive wealth and fostering a larger middle class, yet efforts to introduce property taxes face resistance from Party elites who own multiple homes (because hypocrisy is universal).

Meanwhile, regressive taxes like VAT disproportionately impact poorer households, exacerbating inequality rather than alleviating it. This tension between ideology and reality is one of the defining characteristics of China's economic model—a system that promises equality but often delivers quite the opposite.

Final Thoughts: A Paradox Worth Watching

So, is “billionaires in China” an oxymoron? Not really—it’s more like a paradox that perfectly encapsulates modern China’s economic evolution. The country has mastered the art of blending capitalism with socialism (or at least pretending to), creating an environment where billionaires can thrive as long as they don’t forget who's boss.

For these billionaires, success isn’t just measured in dollars (or yuan); it’s measured in their ability to walk the tightrope between private ambition and public loyalty. And while their American counterparts might spend millions lobbying Congress for favorable tax policies, Chinese billionaires know that their fate ultimately lies in Beijing's hands.

In short: Being a billionaire in China is less about yachts and private islands and more about knowing when to keep your head down—and your wallet open—for charity drives that align with government priorities. Welcome to socialism with Chinese characteristics.

An Overview of Income Tax in China | FDI China https://fdichina.com/blog/income-tax-in-china/

US vs China Tax Policy | Tax Foundation https://taxfoundation.org/blog/us-china-tax-policy/

China, People's Republic of - Corporate - Taxes on corporate income https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/peoples-republic-of-china/corporate/taxes-on-corporate-income 

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
6-4-25

Musk Blasts Trump's Budget and Tax Bill as Bloated https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/03/musk-blasts-trumps-budget-and-tax-bill-as-bloated/ via @dianeravitch 

Elon Musk has publicly criticized Donald Trump’s proposed budget and tax bill, calling it “pork-filled” and “a disgusting abomination.” Musk, who previously worked in Trump’s administration on cost-cutting initiatives, expressed frustration at the budget’s increase despite his initial efforts to reduce government spending. Notably, Musk’s companies, such as SpaceX and Starlink, stand to benefit significantly from federal funding under the new legislation, including projects like a “Golden Dome” defense initiative and Mars exploration. Musk’s condemnation highlights his growing disapproval of Trump’s fiscal policies.

### Key Points

- Elon Musk criticized Trump’s budget and tax bill, labeling it as bloated and filled with unnecessary spending. 

- Musk’s efforts to cut government spending fell short, and he resigned from his cost-cutting role in Trump’s administration. 

- Despite Musk’s criticism, his companies, SpaceX and Starlink, are set to receive substantial federal funding for major initiatives. 

- Musk used social media to strongly condemn the legislation and criticize those who supported it. 

- Trump continues to push for the bill’s passage, aiming for approval by July 4. 

NPR Will Fight Trump's Effort to Cut Off Funding https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/03/npr-will-fight-trumps-effort-to-cut-off-funding/ via @dianeravitch 

NPR is challenging former President Trump's executive order to cut its federal funding, claiming the move is unconstitutional and a violation of the First Amendment. NPR's CEO Katherine Maher emphasized the importance of defending editorial independence and the broader public media system. The lawsuit, filed with three Colorado public radio stations, argues that the order aims to punish NPR for critical coverage and undermine press freedom. Despite political tensions, NPR insists the lawsuit is a defense of constitutional rights, not a partisan act.

### Key Points

- NPR is suing the Trump administration over an executive order to cut its federal funding, citing First Amendment violations and Congressional authority over spending. 

- NPR CEO Katherine Maher stated the organization would not negotiate on editorial principles and emphasized the lawsuit's importance for public media independence. 

- The lawsuit claims the order is a retaliatory action against NPR's critical coverage and a threat to press freedom. 

- NPR, along with Colorado radio stations, seeks to block the order and reaffirm Congress' role in approving public broadcasting funding. 

- The lawsuit is framed as a defense of the Constitution and press freedom, not a political retaliation. 

Why Ukraine Will Win the War https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/03/why-ukraine-will-win-the-war/ via @dianeravitch 

Why Ukraine Will Win the War By dianeravitch June 3, 2025 // 5 Bernard-Henri Levy writes in The Wall Strett journal about Ukraine’s remarkable success in destroying about 1/3 of Russia’s long-range strategic bombers. These are planes that have been delivering death and destruction to civilian targets like schools, homes, and hospitals. Ukraine knocked them out with a single, brilliant strike. He writes: The Ukrainian operation on Sunday was a coordinated attack on four airports in Russia reaching as deep as Siberia. It neutralized 41 “strategic aircraft” and was a brilliant technical performance. Over more than 18 months, hundreds of drones were smuggled deep into

### Key Points

- Ukraine successfully conducted a coordinated drone attack on Russian airports, destroying 41 strategic bombers, marking a significant blow to Russia's military capabilities. 

- The operation demonstrated Ukraine's advanced intelligence and strategic planning, as drones were smuggled into Russia and concealed until deployed. 

- Ukraine has achieved several key victories throughout the war, including sinking the Moskva cruiser, damaging the Kerch Bridge, and neutralizing parts of Russia’s Black Sea fleet. 

- Ukraine's military has evolved into a highly skilled force, utilizing advanced technology and innovative tactics, including drone warfare. 

- The Ukrainian army’s motivation and patriotic spirit contrast starkly with the demoralized Russian troops, who rely on foreign mercenaries. 

- The balance of power is shifting, with Ukraine proving its ability to counter Russian threats and diminish its military dominance. 

Thomas Ultican: Billionaires and Charter Schools in California: A Toxic Deal https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/03/thomas-ultican-billionaires-and-charter-schools-in-california-a-toxic-deal/ via @dianeravitch 

Thomas Ultican examines the transformation of charter schools in California, highlighting how their original purpose as innovative R&D centers for public schools has been overshadowed by billionaire influence. Charter schools were initially meant to aid public education, focusing on innovation for the neediest students, but they have evolved into profit-driven entities, often undermining public schools and contributing little to educational improvement.

### Key Points

- Charter schools were originally intended as innovative R&D centers to support public schools. 

- Their initial purpose was to help public schools, not compete with them or operate for profit. 

- Billionaire involvement in charter schools has shifted their focus toward profiteering and political power. 

- Critics argue that charter schools have caused disruption without significantly improving education. 

- The greed and desire for wealth among billionaires drive their influence in privatizing education. 

Big Education Ape: LINDA MCMAHON: THE HITMAN OF EDUCATION OR JUST A MISGUIDED SUBSTITUTE TEACHER? https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/06/linda-mcmahon-hitman-of-education-or.html 

LINDA MCMAHON: THE HITMAN OF EDUCATION OR JUST A MISGUIDED SUBSTITUTE TEACHER?  

### Key Points

- Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s tenure under Trump is marked by efforts to dismantle the Department of Education, slash funding, and prioritize privatization over inclusivity. 

- McMahon’s controversial policies include redefining Title IX to exclude transgender individuals and threatening schools with funding cuts for inclusivity. 

- Federal budget cuts and alignment of education and research funding with Trump’s goals undermine public education and scientific independence. 

- McMahon’s actions against New York’s ban on Native American mascots highlight contradictions in her civil rights stance. 

- Public backlash and legal challenges define McMahon’s legacy, emphasizing ideology over equitable education. 

Big Education Ape: A BAD PENNY ALWAYS TURNS UP: THE ODYSSEY OF PENNY SCHWINN, PRIVATIZATION'S TYPHOID MARY https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/06/a-bad-penny-always-turns-up-odyssey-of.html 

Penny Schwinn's controversial role in education reform dominate discussions. Meanwhile, Schwinn is portrayed as a polarizing figure in education privatization, tied to billionaire-backed initiatives and accused of ethical conflicts in her career.

### Key Points 

- Penny Schwinn’s career highlights her role in advancing privatization, with ties to organizations like the Broad Academy and TNTP, sparking debates about her ethics and intentions. 

- Schwinn’s controversial tenure in Tennessee included no-bid contracts and alleged conflicts of interest, drawing criticism from lawmakers and public school advocates. 

- Critics argue Schwinn’s actions prioritize privatization over strengthening public education, aligning with billionaire interests and undermining public schools. 

Judas in a Suit: Betrayal in the Halls of Educational Power https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/06/03/when-judas-wears-a-suit-betrayal-in-the-halls-of-educational-power/ 

Betrayal in educational leadership is often subtle yet profoundly damaging. The article explores different forms of betrayal experienced by justice-driven leaders in education, such as political shifts, superficial equity efforts, and personal betrayals by trusted colleagues. It emphasizes the emotional toll betrayal takes on leaders and how it reflects systemic failures. However, it also inspires resilience, urging leaders to remain steadfast in their values, build strong coalitions, and document their experiences to protect their narratives. The piece concludes with a call to create cultures of accountability, solidarity, and integrity in education spaces.

### Key Points

- Betrayal in education leadership often comes disguised in professionalism and policy language, undermining justice and equity efforts. 

- Common forms of betrayal include abandonment during public pressure, political shifts, superficial DEI initiatives, and personal betrayals by trusted colleagues. 

- Betrayal destabilizes trust, breaks spirits, and forces leaders to question their convictions, but it stems from others' fear of truth and change. 

- Betrayal often costs the betrayer their integrity, credibility, and ability to lead authentically, even if they retain power or position. 

- To rise above betrayal, leaders must hold onto their values, protect their peace, build coalitions, document experiences, and share their stories. 

- Solidarity and organizing are essential to counteract betrayal and foster accountability in education spaces. 

- Betrayal should sharpen leaders' resolve and clarify their mission, as their legacy will outlast the disloyalty they face. 

Judas in a Suit: Santa Ono Took the Deal—And Still Got Denied https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/06/03/judas-in-a-suit-how-onos-15-million-loyalty-pledge-sells-out-education/ 

### Key Points

- Santa Ono, once a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) at the University of Michigan, abandoned these principles to align with Florida's political agenda but was still rejected as the president of the University of Florida. 

- Ono's contract included demands for political compliance, such as appointing leaders aligned with Governor DeSantis’s ideology and eliminating DEI initiatives, reflecting authoritarian control over education. 

- The rejection highlights how loyalty and ideological purity are prioritized over merit and past contributions in politically charged environments. 

- The author criticizes the broader trend of political interference in education, warning that it threatens academic freedom, diversity, and institutional integrity. 

- The article calls on educators and leaders to resist compromising their values for political agendas and to prioritize their commitment to students and truth. 

Trump Undercuts Civil Rights Protection for Students Historically Denied Equal Educational Opportunity https://janresseger.wordpress.com/2025/06/03/trump-undercuts-civil-rights-protection-for-students-historically-denied-equal-educational-opportunity/ via @janresseger 

Trump’s administration has aggressively dismantled civil rights protections in education, targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and redirecting civil rights enforcement to favor white individuals. The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has reduced its capacity to process discrimination complaints, shifted focus to “directed investigations,” and issued executive orders undermining protections for marginalized groups, including students of color, disabled students, and LGBTQ+ individuals. Controversial actions include threatening school funding over DEI policies, banning the use of "disparate impact" as a standard for civil rights investigations, and defending Native American mascots despite opposition from Native communities.

### Key Points

- Trump’s administration has systematically attacked DEI programs in public schools and redefined civil rights enforcement to prioritize white individuals. 

- The Department of Education’s OCR has closed regional offices, reduced its investigative capacity, and shifted to directed investigations targeting DEI policies. 

- Trump’s executive orders have eliminated the use of “disparate impact” in civil rights investigations and enforced compliance with anti-DEI policies under threat of funding cuts. 

- Investigations have targeted initiatives like Black student success plans, gender-neutral bathrooms, and racial affinity groups, reflecting a bias against marginalized communities. 

- The administration defended Native American mascots in schools, despite evidence showing their harm to Native students and opposition from Native organizations. 

glen brown: Sandy Koufax https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2025/06/sandy-koufax.html 

Glen Brown's blog post primarily reflects on the legendary career of Sandy Koufax, a baseball icon renowned for his extraordinary skill, sportsmanship, and integrity. The article delves into Koufax's rise to stardom, his record-breaking achievements, his graceful conduct on and off the field, and his enduring legacy as a symbol of excellence in sports. It also highlights Koufax's principled stand during the 1965 World Series, his battle with chronic pain, and his early retirement, which only added to his mythic status.

### Key Points

- The article celebrates Sandy Koufax's transformation from a basketball scholarship student to one of baseball's greatest pitchers, marked by his dominance with the Brooklyn and Los Angeles Dodgers between 1955 and 1966. 

- Koufax's career highlights include four no-hitters, a perfect game, three unanimous Cy Young Awards, and a pitching Triple Crown in 1963. His 1965 World Series performance, including pitching on Yom Kippur, solidified his reputation as a principled and legendary athlete. 

- Despite battling arthritis and enduring immense physical pain, Koufax achieved remarkable feats, including a record 382 strikeouts in a season, before retiring at age 30 to preserve his health. 

- Koufax's legacy extends beyond statistics; his humility, quiet elegance, and refusal to embrace celebrity culture have made him a revered figure in sports and a symbol of integrity. 

- The blog also reflects Glen Brown's broader themes of justice, resistance to oppression, and admiration for individuals who embody excellence and principle. 

Teacher Tom: Children are Not "Blank Slates" https://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2025/06/children-are-not-blank-slates.html 

Children are Not "Blank Slates" challenges the common metaphor of children as empty vessels, emphasizing that children, like seeds, possess innate wisdom and developmental processes. The author argues against standardized education methods that force premature learning, advocating instead for play-based learning and environments that nurture natural growth.

### Key Points

- Children are not "blank slates" but come with innate capacities and developmental wisdom, similar to seeds. 

- Testing or forcing learning is akin to artificially accelerating a seed's growth, which can hinder natural development. 

- A good educator or parent creates conditions for growth rather than dictating it, aligning with natural processes. 

- The mind, like nature, seeks nourishment and grows best when supported rather than controlled. 

Curmudgucation: Oh, Bill. Hush. | National Education Policy Center https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/oh-bill 

The article critiques Bill Gates' involvement in education reform, highlighting his history of unsuccessful initiatives and lack of understanding of education systems. It discusses Gates' recent prediction about AI replacing teachers and doctors, expressing skepticism about his foresight. The piece questions the effectiveness of AI in education, given past failures with technology-driven learning solutions, and critiques the tendency to equate wealth with expertise. The author emphasizes caution in taking Gates' opinions on education and AI seriously.

### Key Points

- Bill Gates has a history of failed education reform initiatives, such as small schools, merit pay, and Common Core, due to his lack of understanding of education systems. 

- Gates' recent prediction that AI will replace teachers and doctors within ten years is met with skepticism, given his poor track record in education reform. 

- The article critiques the overhyped promises of AI in education, noting that past experiments with screen-based learning have been largely unsuccessful. 

- The author highlights the cultural tendency to assume wealthy individuals are experts in any field they engage in, urging skepticism toward Gates' opinions on education and AI. 

Trump's Minister of Propaganda meets a toadying press corps https://open.substack.com/pub/klonsky/p/trumps-minister-of-propaganda-meets?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

### Key Points

- Activists from the Freedom Flotilla Coalition have set sail from Sicily to Gaza to deliver humanitarian aid, despite previous attacks on their vessels. The mission includes notable figures like Greta Thunberg and Rima Hassan. 

- The White House press briefing, led by Karoline Levitt, was criticized for turning into a propaganda session for Trump, with no questions about Gaza and a lack of critical journalism. 

- Former State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller admitted to knowing about Israeli war crimes in Gaza and highlighted internal disagreements within the Biden administration on Israel and Ukraine policies. 

- The Freedom Flotilla Coalition’s broader strategy includes mobilizations by land, such as the upcoming Global March to Gaza, aiming to protest Israel’s actions and call for reopening the Rafah border crossing. 

- Senator Lindsay Graham mocked Greta Thunberg’s involvement in the Gaza mission, reflecting dismissive attitudes from some Western political figures. 

Police Pepper-Spray LGBTQIA+ Protesters: Seattle’s Shameful Crackdown on Queer Resistance https://open.substack.com/pub/jessehagopian/p/police-pepper-spray-lgbtqia-protesters?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

Police Pepper-Spray LGBTQIA+ Protesters: Seattle’s Shameful Crackdown on Queer Resistance https://iamaneducator.com/2025/06/03/police-pepper-spray-lgbtqia-protesters-seattles-shameful-crackdown-on-queer-resistance/ via @JessedHagopian

Seattle's Shameful Crackdown on Queer Resistance highlights the recent violent actions of the Seattle Police Department (SPD) against LGBTQIA+ protesters during a far-right rally at Cal Anderson Park. The article critiques the systemic oppression and state violence targeting queer communities, calls for collective resistance, and promotes the Teach Truth National Day of Action to combat anti-LGBTQIA+ policies and rising fascism.

### Key Points

- Seattle police pepper-sprayed LGBTQIA+ protesters during a far-right rally at Cal Anderson Park, a space significant to the queer community. 

- The rally was deliberately moved to the park by city officials, provoking conflict in the LGBTQIA+ neighborhood. 

- The far-right group praised the police for their support, highlighting the alignment between state forces and rising fascist movements. 

- The article criticizes the rollback of restrictions on police crowd-control methods, such as tear gas and pepper spray, which were previously enacted after the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests. 

- LGBTQIA+ protesters were the only ones arrested during the events, showcasing systemic bias in law enforcement. 

- The author connects current anti-LGBTQIA+ policies, such as book bans and healthcare restrictions, to a broader assault on marginalized communities. 

- A call to action urges mass mobilization and resistance, emphasizing the importance of Pride as a political movement and the need to fight against fascism and repression. 

- The Teach Truth National Day of Action is promoted as a platform to defend LGBTQIA+ rights and fight for educational justice. 

How Would Cutting Federal Aid to Schools Affect Student Achievement? | Shanker Institute https://www.shankerinstitute.org/blog/cutting-federal-aid-schools 

How Would Cutting Federal Aid to Schools Affect Student Achievement?

### Key Points

- The article examines the potential impact of eliminating federal aid to schools, which constitutes about 10% of K-12 revenue, on student achievement. 

- Simulations indicate that removing federal funding would cause significant harm to most students, regardless of demographics, with higher-poverty districts suffering more. 

- Federal aid is crucial, especially for districts with less adequate funding, which tend to achieve lower testing outcomes. 

- The removal of federal aid would result in an average decrease in student achievement equivalent to about 28 days of learning per year. 

- The loss would disproportionately affect Black, Hispanic, and American Indian students, as well as students in high-poverty districts. 

- Under a block grant scenario, where states distribute federal aid without considering need, achievement gaps would widen between different student and district groups. 

- The block grant scenario could lead to moderate gains for some students but losses for others, exacerbating existing disparities. 

Choosing Democracy: MUSK is Leaving after Gaining Billions in Future Contracts https://choosingdemocracy.blogspot.com/2025/06/musk-is-leaving-after-gaining-billions.html 

Choosing Democracy: Major Issues in Democracy and Public Schooling

### Key Points

- Elon Musk's departure from DOGE is compared to an abusive relationship where progress, though incomplete, should be acknowledged as a collective achievement. 

- Musk's 130-day tenure at DOGE was marked by mass firings, missed financial goals, and actions that enriched himself while undermining democracy. 

- Musk secured billions in government contracts, stole data, and disrupted investigations into his companies, while creating a political rift with Trump in his final weeks. 

- Key members of Musk's team, including Steve Davis and Katie Miller, are also leaving, creating significant gaps in DOGE's operations. 

Michael and Amy https://open.substack.com/pub/arthurgoldstein/p/michael-and-amy?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

### Key Points

- Michael Mulgrew narrowly wins re-election as UFT President, followed by the announcement of a new health plan with limited details, raising concerns among members. 

- Critics argue the new health plan may shift costs to members, introduce prior authorizations, and reduce oversight, echoing past issues with Medicare Advantage plans. 

- UFT's healthcare committee, dominated by Unity members loyal to Mulgrew, is seen as a rubber stamp rather than a democratic body. 

- Concerns are raised about transparency and past actions, such as the 2018 contract changes, which included hidden provisions affecting retirees. 

- Unity's lowest vote total ever indicates growing dissatisfaction among members, with opposition groups like ABC determined to hold leadership accountable. 

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Two Updates of Interest for SPS Parents https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/06/two-updates-of-interest-for-sps-parents.html?spref=tw 

Seattle Schools Community Forum discusses updates on Seattle Public Schools, including expanded summer programs and systemic challenges.

### Key Points

- The Running Start program now offers tuition-free summer classes for high school students, enabling them to earn college credits. However, awareness of the program is limited, particularly among underrepresented groups. 

- Students in Edmonds use summer Running Start to fulfill high school graduation requirements, providing more flexibility during the school year. 

- An email from the new Highly Capable director announced a summer online math course for HC students, allowing them to advance in math. Concerns were raised about late communication and limited access for non-HC students with strong math skills. 

- The Seattle Times seeks input from parents regarding summer child care enrollment and associated challenges. 

- Allegations of nepotism within Seattle Public Schools highlight issues of favoritism in hiring and promotions, particularly among principals and senior staff. 

Centering Children: Challenging the 'Parental Rights' Narrative for the Sake of Our Kids https://open.substack.com/pub/brucelesley/p/centering-children-challenging-the?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

The article examines the urgent need to prioritize children's rights and protections over the growing "parental rights" movement, which often marginalizes children’s autonomy and well-being. It critiques policies and societal norms that neglect children's needs, calling for a child-centered society and a "Children's Liberation Theology" that values children as individuals with inherent rights. The article highlights the harmful effects of current political, legal, and religious systems on children, advocating for systemic changes to ensure their safety, dignity, and voice.

### Key Points  

- Ryan Stollar’s book *Kingdom of Children* advocates for prioritizing children’s rights and protections, challenging the view of children as extensions of their parents or future adults.   

- Stollar calls for a fundamental transformation to recognize children as deserving of dignity, protection, and voice.   

- The federal budget reconciliation bill proposes cuts to Medicaid, CHIP, and SNAP, which would increase child poverty, hunger, and poor health outcomes.   

- The bill excludes 20 million low-income children from the full Child Tax Credit, disproportionately harming vulnerable children.   

- The "parental rights" movement elevates parental authority while marginalizing children’s autonomy and safety, framing harmful policies as pro-family.   

- Conservative groups like HSLDA and Focus on the Family have opposed regulations that protect children, promoting near-absolute parental sovereignty.   

- Many states allow religious exemptions from child abuse laws, enabling parents to deny children medical care or inflict harm with little accountability.   

- The "Parents’ Bill of Rights" and similar initiatives prioritize parental control over children’s well-being and rights.   

- Moral panics around protecting children often misdirect attention to cultural issues while ignoring critical matters like child poverty and abuse.   

- The parental rights movement denies children their own rights, treating them as property rather than individuals with agency.   

- Children often lack legal representation and protections, even in life-threatening situations, due to parental authority.   

- Stollar advocates for a "child liberation theology," emphasizing children’s inherent worth and the need to listen to their voices.   

- Policies should prioritize children’s well-being, such as expanding health coverage, reducing child poverty, and investing in education and nutrition.   

- Churches and institutions must address their complicity in systems that harm children, including shielding abusers and promoting harsh discipline.   

- A child-centered society requires systemic changes in politics, education, health care, and cultural attitudes to prioritize children’s needs and rights.   

- The article calls for rejecting adult-centric policies and building a society that truly protects and enables children to flourish. 

Big Changes and Controversy in Oakland https://tultican.com/2025/06/04/big-changes-and-controversy-in-oakland/ 

Elected school boards play a crucial role in American democracy, as highlighted by the controversy within the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD). The article discusses the alleged firing of Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell, the involvement of board members with corporate-backed factions, and the financial and governance challenges faced by the district. The transition to new leadership and the district's efforts to address fiscal constraints and declining enrollment are also explored.

### Key Points

- A new Oakland school board majority was accused of firing Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell, but this claim was misleading. 

- Board members Patrice Berry and Clifford Thomson are linked to corporate-backed groups like Empower Oakland and Families in Action, raising concerns about their alignment. 

- The August 2024 contract with Johnson-Trammell raised concerns due to fiscal constraints and governance issues, leading to productive negotiations for a transition plan. 

- Denise Sadler will become interim superintendent on July 1, 2025, while Johnson-Trammell will serve as superintendent emeritus until January 2026. 

- Johnson-Trammell's tenure is marked by mixed opinions, with achievements like paying off the district's state loan but criticism for supporting charter schools and education technology. 

- The influence of billionaire-backed charter school groups has declined, and charter school enrollment in Oakland has been decreasing since 2019. 

- Oakland faces a $75 million budget deficit due to declining enrollment, but the new board majority is expected to prioritize students and staff. 

An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else: Ravitch, Diane: 9780231220293: Amazon.com: Books https://www.amazon.com/Education-Changed-Schools-Almost-Everything/dp/0231220294/ref=sr_1_1?

This article discusses Diane Ravitch's upcoming memoir, "An Education: How I Changed My Mind About Schools and Almost Everything Else," set to be released on October 21, 2025. Ravitch, a historian and former conservative education reform advocate, recounts her ideological shift from supporting standardized testing and privatization to advocating for public schools and addressing systemic inequality in education. The book blends personal reflections with decades of research, making a compelling case for greater investment in public education.

### Key Points

- Diane Ravitch's memoir explores her ideological transformation from a proponent of conservative education reforms to a critic of privatization and standardized testing. 

- The book highlights her belief that poverty, not failing schools or bad teachers, is the root cause of educational inequality. 

- Ravitch shares her personal and professional journey, including her government service and advocacy for public schools. 

- The memoir combines personal anecdotes with research to argue for systemic changes in education, including better support for professional teachers. 

- Published by Columbia University Press, the book is 240 pages long and will be available in multiple formats. 

Big Education Ape: WE DON'T DO KINGS: NATIONWIDE PROTESTS TO RAIN ON TRUMP'S $45M BIRTHDAY MILITARY PARADE #NoKingsDay #DefendDemocracy #AmericaStrong https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/05/we-dont-do-kings-nationwide-protests-to.html 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!

6-3-25      

The article compiles various topics related to education, politics, societal issues, and activism. It highlights controversies surrounding privatization, budget cuts, LGBTQ+ rights, environmental impacts on education, and political actions undermining democracy. It also discusses initiatives like integrating AI in schools, Pride Month celebrations, and the importance of cultural transformation in education.  

### Key Points  

- Linda McMahon's education budget proposes eliminating $8.5 billion in funding, targeting programs for migrant children, English learners, and teacher development, while increasing charter school funding and promoting private school vouchers. Critics argue this prioritizes privatization over public education.   

- Elon Musk's controversial role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) involved alleged misuse of power, securing contracts for his companies, and budget cuts with global consequences. DOGE's actions raised legal and ethical concerns, including lawsuits and inefficiency in federal agencies.   

- Trump's immigration policies and tariff strategies caused economic instability, legal crises, and humanitarian issues, with critics highlighting authoritarian tendencies and mass surveillance concerns.   

- Jamelle Bouie critiques the Republican tax plan for disproportionately benefiting the wealthy while cutting essential programs like Medicaid and food assistance, worsening inequality.   

- A brain-dead pregnant woman in Georgia is being kept on life support due to restrictive abortion laws. The decision highlights government overreach and raises ethical debates.   

- Pride Month 2025 celebrates LGBTQ+ history and resilience amidst over 700 anti-LGBTQ+ bills threatening their rights. Activism and grassroots support remain strong.   

- Miami-Dade County Public Schools integrate AI tools like Google’s Gemini chatbot to prepare students for future job demands while addressing ethical concerns about AI reliance and critical thinking erosion.   

- Teacher Tom advocates for fostering a love of reading in children by allowing self-selected books, criticizing structured academic reading for undermining deep reading and empathy development.   

- Trump administration's manipulation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) language turned these terms into divisive concepts, censoring inclusive education and promoting exclusionary policies.   

- Elevated air pollution levels lead to increased absenteeism, disciplinary issues, and negative impacts on lower-income schools, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities.   

- Diane Ravitch's upcoming memoir explores her ideological shift from supporting privatization to advocating for public education and addressing systemic inequality.   

- Nationwide protests criticize Trump’s $45M military parade, emphasizing anti-fascism and defending democracy.   

- Penny Schwinn's career in education reform highlights controversies over privatization efforts and connections to billionaire-backed organizations, sparking debates about public education.   

- Christian nationalism's influence on education raises concerns about censorship, equity, and historical exclusionary tactics, with webinars addressing these issues.