Special Nite Cap: Catch Up on Today's Post 12/3/16
Saturday, December 3, 2016
Universal Design for Learning or Microcosm for Destruction?
Universal Design for Learning or Microcosm for Destruction?:
Universal Design for Learning or Microcosm for Destruction?
Universal Design for Learning or Microcosm for Destruction?
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a part of the new Every Student Succeeds Act. It promotes what is heralded as a new way to reach students with diverse needs. It sounds new agey.
But what does this miracle program have that those of us who worked in special education for years don’t? You may, like me, scratch your head at first.
Some Background
Much harm has been done to public schools, special education, and the teaching profession with high-stakes testing.
Most of us understand that such testing was meant to shut down public schools.
Insisting that every child, even those with the most challenging medical disabilities, reach the same standards, has meant that teachers, good teachers, would fail. Schools would close. Special education would cease.
Claiming that everyone could reach the same standards was a lie. Almost everyoneUniversal Design for Learning or Microcosm for Destruction?:
Obscure law would allow Trump’s billionaire pals to skip out on millions in taxes if they join his cabinet
Obscure law would allow Trump’s billionaire pals to skip out on millions in taxes if they join his cabinet:
Obscure law would allow Trump’s billionaire pals to skip out on millions in taxes if they join his cabinet
Obscure law would allow Trump’s billionaire pals to skip out on millions in taxes if they join his cabinet
Trump appointees Steve Mnuchin, and Betsy DeVos -- Shutterstock
Beyond the prestige of holding a top position in President-elect Donald Trump’s administration is an extra bonus for what is shaping up to be the richest cabinet ever.
According to the Washington Post, wealthy cabinet members may be in line to duck out on paying hundreds of million dollars in federal taxes on capital gains.
While Republican President Abraham Lincoln may have had his “team of rivals,” Trump’s early cabinet choices are shaping up to a “band of billionaires.” Those rich folks will be given the opportunity to shape U.S. policy in ways that help out the wealthiest one percent — while making out pretty well for themselves.
Buried deep in Section 2634 of federal ethics laws is a tax avoidance maneuver called a “certificate of divestiture,” that allows incoming cabinet picks to sell off billions of dollars in assets — in order to avoid future conflicts of interest — much of them tax-free.
When former President George W. Bush selected Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson top serve as his treasury secretary, Paulson sold off approximately a half a billion dollars’ worth of Goldman stock and avoided what might have totaled over $200 million in capital gains taxes.
According to Robert Lenhard, a campaign-finance lawyer and former FEC chairman, the law was put in place out of fairness to potential administration picks.
“If you suddenly had to absorb the capital-gains taxes of substantial parts of your holdings, it would be a real body blow to some people financially,” he explained. “I just think of it as an act of fairness for those people entering public service.”
Depending on the position, not all cabinet secretaries will be asked to divest themselves of holdings that might give rise to questions of conflicts of interest, but those who want to take advantage on the law could recognize substantial savings, including possible education secretary, Betsy DeVos, whose family fortune is estimated at approximately $5 billion.Obscure law would allow Trump’s billionaire pals to skip out on millions in taxes if they join his cabinet: